A Journal of the Plague Year - 22

Total number of words is 3527
Total number of unique words is 836
62.4 of words are in the 2000 most common words
81.2 of words are in the 5000 most common words
86.5 of words are in the 8000 most common words
Each bar represents the percentage of words per 1000 most common words.

Here also I ought to leave a further remark for the use of posterity, concerning the manner of people’s infecting one another; namely, that it was not the sick people only from whom the plague was immediately received by others that were sound, but the well. To explain myself: by the sick people I mean those who were known to be sick, had taken their beds, had been under cure, or had swellings and tumours upon them, and the like; these everybody could beware of; they were either in their beds or in such condition as could not be concealed.

By the well I mean such as had received the contagion, and had it really upon them, and in their blood, yet did not show the consequences of it in their countenances: nay, even were not sensible of it themselves, as many were not for several days. These breathed death in every place, and upon everybody who came near them; nay, their very clothes retained the infection, their hands would infect the things they touched, especially if they were warm and sweaty, and they were generally apt to sweat too.

Now it was impossible to know these people, nor did they sometimes, as I have said, know themselves to be infected. These were the people that so often dropped down and fainted in the streets; for oftentimes they would go about the streets to the last, till on a sudden they would sweat, grow faint, sit down at a door and die. It is true, finding themselves thus, they would struggle hard to get home to their own doors, or at other times would be just able to go into their houses and die instantly; other times they would go about till they had the very tokens come out upon them, and yet not know it, and would die in an hour or two after they came home, but be well as long as they were abroad. These were the dangerous people; these were the people of whom the well people ought to have been afraid; but then, on the other side, it was impossible to know them.

And this is the reason why it is impossible in a visitation to prevent the spreading of the plague by the utmost human vigilance: viz., that it is impossible to know the infected people from the sound, or that the infected people should perfectly know themselves. I knew a man who conversed freely in London all the season of the plague in 1665, and kept about him an antidote or cordial on purpose to take when he thought himself in any danger, and he had such a rule to know or have warning of the danger by as indeed I never met with before or since. How far it may be depended on I know not. He had a wound in his leg, and whenever he came among any people that were not sound, and the infection began to affect him, he said he could know it by that signal, viz., that his wound in his leg would smart, and look pale and white; so as soon as ever he felt it smart it was time for him to withdraw, or to take care of himself, taking his drink, which he always carried about him for that purpose. Now it seems he found his wound would smart many times when he was in company with such who thought themselves to be sound, and who appeared so to one another; but he would presently rise up and say publicly, ‘Friends, here is somebody in the room that has the plague’, and so would immediately break up the company. This was indeed a faithful monitor to all people that the plague is not to be avoided by those that converse promiscuously in a town infected, and people have it when they know it not, and that they likewise give it to others when they know not that they have it themselves; and in this case shutting up the well or removing the sick will not do it, unless they can go back and shut up all those that the sick had conversed with, even before they knew themselves to be sick, and none knows how far to carry that back, or where to stop; for none knows when or where or how they may have received the infection, or from whom.

This I take to be the reason which makes so many people talk of the air being corrupted and infected, and that they need not be cautious of whom they converse with, for that the contagion was in the air. I have seen them in strange agitations and surprises on this account. ‘I have never come near any infected body’, says the disturbed person; ‘I have conversed with none but sound, healthy people, and yet I have gotten the distemper!’ ‘I am sure I am struck from Heaven’, says another, and he falls to the serious part. Again, the first goes on exclaiming, ‘I have come near no infection or any infected person; I am sure it is the air. We draw in death when we breathe, and therefore ’tis the hand of God; there is no withstanding it.’ And this at last made many people, being hardened to the danger, grow less concerned at it; and less cautious towards the latter end of the time, and when it was come to its height, than they were at first. Then, with a kind of a Turkish predestinarianism, they would say, if it pleased God to strike them, it was all one whether they went abroad or stayed at home; they could not escape it, and therefore they went boldly about, even into infected houses and infected company; visited sick people; and, in short, lay in the beds with their wives or relations when they were infected. And what was the consequence, but the same that is the consequence in Turkey, and in those countries where they do those things—namely, that they were infected too, and died by hundreds and thousands?

I would be far from lessening the awe of the judgements of God and the reverence to His providence which ought always to be on our minds on such occasions as these. Doubtless the visitation itself is a stroke from Heaven upon a city, or country, or nation where it falls; a messenger of His vengeance, and a loud call to that nation or country or city to humiliation and repentance, according to that of the prophet Jeremiah (xviii. 7, 8): ‘At what instant I shall speak concerning a nation, and concerning a kingdom, to pluck up, and to pull down, and to destroy it; if that nation against whom I have pronounced turn from their evil, I will repent of the evil that I thought to do unto them.’ Now to prompt due impressions of the awe of God on the minds of men on such occasions, and not to lessen them, it is that I have left those minutes upon record.

I say, therefore, I reflect upon no man for putting the reason of those things upon the immediate hand of God, and the appointment and direction of His providence; nay, on the contrary, there were many wonderful deliverances of persons from infection, and deliverances of persons when infected, which intimate singular and remarkable providence in the particular instances to which they refer; and I esteem my own deliverance to be one next to miraculous, and do record it with thankfulness.

But when I am speaking of the plague as a distemper arising from natural causes, we must consider it as it was really propagated by natural means; nor is it at all the less a judgement for its being under the conduct of human causes and effects; for, as the Divine Power has formed the whole scheme of nature and maintains nature in its course, so the same Power thinks fit to let His own actings with men, whether of mercy or judgement, to go on in the ordinary course of natural causes; and He is pleased to act by those natural causes as the ordinary means, excepting and reserving to Himself nevertheless a power to act in a supernatural way when He sees occasion. Now ’tis evident that in the case of an infection there is no apparent extraordinary occasion for supernatural operation, but the ordinary course of things appears sufficiently armed, and made capable of all the effects that Heaven usually directs by a contagion. Among these causes and effects, this of the secret conveyance of infection, imperceptible and unavoidable, is more than sufficient to execute the fierceness of Divine vengeance, without putting it upon supernaturals and miracle.

The acute penetrating nature of the disease itself was such, and the infection was received so imperceptibly, that the most exact caution could not secure us while in the place. But I must be allowed to believe—and I have so many examples fresh in my memory to convince me of it, that I think none can resist their evidence—I say, I must be allowed to believe that no one in this whole nation ever received the sickness or infection but who received it in the ordinary way of infection from somebody, or the clothes or touch or stench of somebody that was infected before.

The manner of its coming first to London proves this also, viz., by goods brought over from Holland, and brought thither from the Levant; the first breaking of it out in a house in Long Acre where those goods were carried and first opened; its spreading from that house to other houses by the visible unwary conversing with those who were sick; and the infecting the parish officers who were employed about the persons dead, and the like. These are known authorities for this great foundation point—that it went on and proceeded from person to person and from house to house, and no otherwise. In the first house that was infected there died four persons. A neighbour, hearing the mistress of the first house was sick, went to visit her, and went home and gave the distemper to her family, and died, and all her household. A minister, called to pray with the first sick person in the second house, was said to sicken immediately and die with several more in his house. Then the physicians began to consider, for they did not at first dream of a general contagion. But the physicians being sent to inspect the bodies, they assured the people that it was neither more or less than the plague, with all its terrifying particulars, and that it threatened an universal infection, so many people having already conversed with the sick or distempered, and having, as might be supposed, received infection from them, that it would be impossible to put a stop to it.

Here the opinion of the physicians agreed with my observation afterwards, namely, that the danger was spreading insensibly, for the sick could infect none but those that came within reach of the sick person; but that one man who may have really received the infection and knows it not, but goes abroad and about as a sound person, may give the plague to a thousand people, and they to greater numbers in proportion, and neither the person giving the infection or the persons receiving it know anything of it, and perhaps not feel the effects of it for several days after.

For example, many persons in the time of this visitation never perceived that they were infected till they found to their unspeakable surprise, the tokens come out upon them; after which they seldom lived six hours; for those spots they called the tokens were really gangrene spots, or mortified flesh in small knobs as broad as a little silver penny, and hard as a piece of callus or horn; so that, when the disease was come up to that length, there was nothing could follow but certain death; and yet, as I said, they knew nothing of their being infected, nor found themselves so much as out of order, till those mortal marks were upon them. But everybody must allow that they were infected in a high degree before, and must have been so some time, and consequently their breath, their sweat, their very clothes, were contagious for many days before. This occasioned a vast variety of cases which physicians would have much more opportunity to remember than I; but some came within the compass of my observation or hearing, of which I shall name a few.

A certain citizen who had lived safe and untouched till the month of September, when the weight of the distemper lay more in the city than it had done before, was mighty cheerful, and something too bold (as I think it was) in his talk of how secure he was, how cautious he had been, and how he had never come near any sick body. Says another citizen, a neighbour of his, to him one day, ‘Do not be too confident, Mr—; it is hard to say who is sick and who is well, for we see men alive and well to outward appearance one hour, and dead the next.’ ‘That is true’, says the first man, for he was not a man presumptuously secure, but had escaped a long while—and men, as I said above, especially in the city began to be over-easy upon that score. ‘That is true,’ says he; ‘I do not think myself secure, but I hope I have not been in company with any person that there has been any danger in.’ ‘No?’ says his neighbour. ‘Was not you at the Bull Head Tavern in Gracechurch Street with Mr—the night before last?’ ‘Yes,’ says the first, ‘I was; but there was nobody there that we had any reason to think dangerous.’ Upon which his neighbour said no more, being unwilling to surprise him; but this made him more inquisitive, and as his neighbour appeared backward, he was the more impatient, and in a kind of warmth says he aloud, ‘Why, he is not dead, is he?’ Upon which his neighbour still was silent, but cast up his eyes and said something to himself; at which the first citizen turned pale, and said no more but this, ‘Then I am a dead man too’, and went home immediately and sent for a neighbouring apothecary to give him something preventive, for he had not yet found himself ill; but the apothecary, opening his breast, fetched a sigh, and said no more but this, ‘Look up to God’; and the man died in a few hours.

Now let any man judge from a case like this if it is possible for the regulations of magistrates, either by shutting up the sick or removing them, to stop an infection which spreads itself from man to man even while they are perfectly well and insensible of its approach, and may be so for many days.

It may be proper to ask here how long it may be supposed men might have the seeds of the contagion in them before it discovered itself in this fatal manner, and how long they might go about seemingly whole, and yet be contagious to all those that came near them. I believe the most experienced physicians cannot answer this question directly any more than I can; and something an ordinary observer may take notice of, which may pass their observations. The opinion of physicians abroad seems to be that it may lie dormant in the spirits or in the blood-vessels a very considerable time. Why else do they exact a quarantine of those who came into their harbours and ports from suspected places? Forty days is, one would think, too long for nature to struggle with such an enemy as this, and not conquer it or yield to it. But I could not think, by my own observation, that they can be infected so as to be contagious to others above fifteen or sixteen days at furthest; and on that score it was, that when a house was shut up in the city and any one had died of the plague, but nobody appeared to be ill in the family for sixteen or eighteen days after, they were not so strict but that they would connive at their going privately abroad; nor would people be much afraid of them afterward, but rather think they were fortified the better, having not been vulnerable when the enemy was in their own house; but we sometimes found it had lain much longer concealed.

Upon the foot of all these observations I must say that though Providence seemed to direct my conduct to be otherwise, yet it is my opinion, and I must leave it as a prescription, viz., that the best physic against the plague is to run away from it. I know people encourage themselves by saying God is able to keep us in the midst of danger, and able to overtake us when we think ourselves out of danger; and this kept thousands in the town whose carcases went into the great pits by cartloads, and who, if they had fled from the danger, had, I believe, been safe from the disaster; at least ’tis probable they had been safe.

And were this very fundamental only duly considered by the people on any future occasion of this or the like nature, I am persuaded it would put them upon quite different measures for managing the people from those that they took in 1665, or than any that have been taken abroad that I have heard of. In a word, they would consider of separating the people into smaller bodies, and removing them in time farther from one another—and not let such a contagion as this, which is indeed chiefly dangerous to collected bodies of people, find a million of people in a body together, as was very near the case before, and would certainly be the case if it should ever appear again.

The plague, like a great fire, if a few houses only are contiguous where it happens, can only burn a few houses; or if it begins in a single, or, as we call it, a lone house, can only burn that lone house where it begins. But if it begins in a close-built town or city and gets a head, there its fury increases: it rages over the whole place, and consumes all it can reach.

I could propose many schemes on the foot of which the government of this city, if ever they should be under the apprehensions of such another enemy (God forbid they should), might ease themselves of the greatest part of the dangerous people that belong to them; I mean such as the begging, starving, labouring poor, and among them chiefly those who, in case of a siege, are called the useless mouths; who being then prudently and to their own advantage disposed of, and the wealthy inhabitants disposing of themselves and of their servants and children, the city and its adjacent parts would be so effectually evacuated that there would not be above a tenth part of its people left together for the disease to take hold upon. But suppose them to be a fifth part, and that two hundred and fifty thousand people were left: and if it did seize upon them, they would, by their living so much at large, be much better prepared to defend themselves against the infection, and be less liable to the effects of it than if the same number of people lived close together in one smaller city such as Dublin or Amsterdam or the like.

It is true hundreds, yea, thousands of families fled away at this last plague, but then of them, many fled too late, and not only died in their flight, but carried the distemper with them into the countries where they went and infected those whom they went among for safety; which confounded the thing, and made that be a propagation of the distemper which was the best means to prevent it; and this too is an evidence of it, and brings me back to what I only hinted at before, but must speak more fully to here, namely, that men went about apparently well many days after they had the taint of the disease in their vitals, and after their spirits were so seized as that they could never escape it, and that all the while they did so they were dangerous to others; I say, this proves that so it was; for such people infected the very towns they went through, as well as the families they went among; and it was by that means that almost all the great towns in England had the distemper among them, more or less, and always they would tell you such a Londoner or such a Londoner brought it down.

You have read 1 text from English literature.
Next - A Journal of the Plague Year - 23
  • Parts
  • A Journal of the Plague Year - 01
    Total number of words is 3152
    Total number of unique words is 752
    63.1 of words are in the 2000 most common words
    79.1 of words are in the 5000 most common words
    85.9 of words are in the 8000 most common words
    Each bar represents the percentage of words per 1000 most common words.
  • A Journal of the Plague Year - 02
    Total number of words is 3628
    Total number of unique words is 912
    61.0 of words are in the 2000 most common words
    77.8 of words are in the 5000 most common words
    83.2 of words are in the 8000 most common words
    Each bar represents the percentage of words per 1000 most common words.
  • A Journal of the Plague Year - 03
    Total number of words is 3379
    Total number of unique words is 955
    58.5 of words are in the 2000 most common words
    75.8 of words are in the 5000 most common words
    81.3 of words are in the 8000 most common words
    Each bar represents the percentage of words per 1000 most common words.
  • A Journal of the Plague Year - 04
    Total number of words is 3298
    Total number of unique words is 944
    54.8 of words are in the 2000 most common words
    73.1 of words are in the 5000 most common words
    80.2 of words are in the 8000 most common words
    Each bar represents the percentage of words per 1000 most common words.
  • A Journal of the Plague Year - 05
    Total number of words is 3192
    Total number of unique words is 784
    53.3 of words are in the 2000 most common words
    70.2 of words are in the 5000 most common words
    77.3 of words are in the 8000 most common words
    Each bar represents the percentage of words per 1000 most common words.
  • A Journal of the Plague Year - 06
    Total number of words is 3612
    Total number of unique words is 832
    64.0 of words are in the 2000 most common words
    80.9 of words are in the 5000 most common words
    87.3 of words are in the 8000 most common words
    Each bar represents the percentage of words per 1000 most common words.
  • A Journal of the Plague Year - 07
    Total number of words is 3710
    Total number of unique words is 901
    62.6 of words are in the 2000 most common words
    79.1 of words are in the 5000 most common words
    86.1 of words are in the 8000 most common words
    Each bar represents the percentage of words per 1000 most common words.
  • A Journal of the Plague Year - 08
    Total number of words is 3395
    Total number of unique words is 876
    62.5 of words are in the 2000 most common words
    79.2 of words are in the 5000 most common words
    86.5 of words are in the 8000 most common words
    Each bar represents the percentage of words per 1000 most common words.
  • A Journal of the Plague Year - 09
    Total number of words is 3535
    Total number of unique words is 910
    61.0 of words are in the 2000 most common words
    77.5 of words are in the 5000 most common words
    83.1 of words are in the 8000 most common words
    Each bar represents the percentage of words per 1000 most common words.
  • A Journal of the Plague Year - 10
    Total number of words is 3578
    Total number of unique words is 875
    62.1 of words are in the 2000 most common words
    79.3 of words are in the 5000 most common words
    84.9 of words are in the 8000 most common words
    Each bar represents the percentage of words per 1000 most common words.
  • A Journal of the Plague Year - 11
    Total number of words is 3393
    Total number of unique words is 853
    56.7 of words are in the 2000 most common words
    74.0 of words are in the 5000 most common words
    80.9 of words are in the 8000 most common words
    Each bar represents the percentage of words per 1000 most common words.
  • A Journal of the Plague Year - 12
    Total number of words is 3670
    Total number of unique words is 845
    65.0 of words are in the 2000 most common words
    79.8 of words are in the 5000 most common words
    86.4 of words are in the 8000 most common words
    Each bar represents the percentage of words per 1000 most common words.
  • A Journal of the Plague Year - 13
    Total number of words is 3080
    Total number of unique words is 759
    64.9 of words are in the 2000 most common words
    79.1 of words are in the 5000 most common words
    84.6 of words are in the 8000 most common words
    Each bar represents the percentage of words per 1000 most common words.
  • A Journal of the Plague Year - 14
    Total number of words is 3575
    Total number of unique words is 807
    65.0 of words are in the 2000 most common words
    82.1 of words are in the 5000 most common words
    86.4 of words are in the 8000 most common words
    Each bar represents the percentage of words per 1000 most common words.
  • A Journal of the Plague Year - 15
    Total number of words is 3720
    Total number of unique words is 802
    65.9 of words are in the 2000 most common words
    81.2 of words are in the 5000 most common words
    86.9 of words are in the 8000 most common words
    Each bar represents the percentage of words per 1000 most common words.
  • A Journal of the Plague Year - 16
    Total number of words is 3501
    Total number of unique words is 814
    63.6 of words are in the 2000 most common words
    79.5 of words are in the 5000 most common words
    86.1 of words are in the 8000 most common words
    Each bar represents the percentage of words per 1000 most common words.
  • A Journal of the Plague Year - 17
    Total number of words is 3342
    Total number of unique words is 844
    58.4 of words are in the 2000 most common words
    77.5 of words are in the 5000 most common words
    82.8 of words are in the 8000 most common words
    Each bar represents the percentage of words per 1000 most common words.
  • A Journal of the Plague Year - 18
    Total number of words is 3582
    Total number of unique words is 853
    62.5 of words are in the 2000 most common words
    79.6 of words are in the 5000 most common words
    87.6 of words are in the 8000 most common words
    Each bar represents the percentage of words per 1000 most common words.
  • A Journal of the Plague Year - 19
    Total number of words is 3448
    Total number of unique words is 802
    62.9 of words are in the 2000 most common words
    78.8 of words are in the 5000 most common words
    87.1 of words are in the 8000 most common words
    Each bar represents the percentage of words per 1000 most common words.
  • A Journal of the Plague Year - 20
    Total number of words is 3340
    Total number of unique words is 837
    61.4 of words are in the 2000 most common words
    79.1 of words are in the 5000 most common words
    85.1 of words are in the 8000 most common words
    Each bar represents the percentage of words per 1000 most common words.
  • A Journal of the Plague Year - 21
    Total number of words is 3049
    Total number of unique words is 764
    59.2 of words are in the 2000 most common words
    75.1 of words are in the 5000 most common words
    80.9 of words are in the 8000 most common words
    Each bar represents the percentage of words per 1000 most common words.
  • A Journal of the Plague Year - 22
    Total number of words is 3527
    Total number of unique words is 836
    62.4 of words are in the 2000 most common words
    81.2 of words are in the 5000 most common words
    86.5 of words are in the 8000 most common words
    Each bar represents the percentage of words per 1000 most common words.
  • A Journal of the Plague Year - 23
    Total number of words is 3248
    Total number of unique words is 787
    60.5 of words are in the 2000 most common words
    80.1 of words are in the 5000 most common words
    86.3 of words are in the 8000 most common words
    Each bar represents the percentage of words per 1000 most common words.
  • A Journal of the Plague Year - 24
    Total number of words is 3542
    Total number of unique words is 849
    58.3 of words are in the 2000 most common words
    75.5 of words are in the 5000 most common words
    82.8 of words are in the 8000 most common words
    Each bar represents the percentage of words per 1000 most common words.
  • A Journal of the Plague Year - 25
    Total number of words is 3443
    Total number of unique words is 886
    56.0 of words are in the 2000 most common words
    71.3 of words are in the 5000 most common words
    78.1 of words are in the 8000 most common words
    Each bar represents the percentage of words per 1000 most common words.
  • A Journal of the Plague Year - 26
    Total number of words is 3598
    Total number of unique words is 882
    59.9 of words are in the 2000 most common words
    77.4 of words are in the 5000 most common words
    83.0 of words are in the 8000 most common words
    Each bar represents the percentage of words per 1000 most common words.
  • A Journal of the Plague Year - 27
    Total number of words is 3554
    Total number of unique words is 927
    58.8 of words are in the 2000 most common words
    76.7 of words are in the 5000 most common words
    83.6 of words are in the 8000 most common words
    Each bar represents the percentage of words per 1000 most common words.
  • A Journal of the Plague Year - 28
    Total number of words is 1376
    Total number of unique words is 493
    69.6 of words are in the 2000 most common words
    82.8 of words are in the 5000 most common words
    87.4 of words are in the 8000 most common words
    Each bar represents the percentage of words per 1000 most common words.